Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
I beleive the answer is b. Socail Contact.
Explanation:
The PWC should be overturned completely.However,the person in charge should be very familiar with the right procedure which is used in the PWC as well as re-boarding it.Some manufacturers have placed a craft which guides in rolling your PWC in an upright position.
Option B is the correct answer :)
Answer:
The answer is Social Justice Warrior.
Explanation:
As the passage explains, the term originated in the nineties as a compliment. It was used by the Montreal Gazzette to describe Québec activist Michel Chartrand. At present, the term is used to make fun of people who expose their progressive views online, especially when it's evident they don't <em>really</em> hold their views, but pretend to do it for validation.
