I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
As the Qin Dynasty ruled until 206 BC and writer of the essay, Jia Yi, was born in 200 BC and died in 168 or 169 BC, the document was probably written around 20 or 30 years after the fall of the Qin Dynasty.
After centuries of war among the states of ancient China, the Qin conquered all others in just twenty-five years. Under the rule of Qin, China saw sweeping reforms and massive public works projects. Despite these achievements, the Qin dynasty lasted only fifteen years.
Explanation:
Advantage on the left and disadvantage in the right hope this helps :)
I believe the answer is: Borderline personality disorder
People with borderline personality disorder tend to have inconsistent image, moods, and behaviors.
This situation often caused the people around the victims to have a very hard time in adjusting and accepting their behavior and make it very hard for the victim to develop meaningful relationship.
