The margin of error of the random selection is 0.29
The given parameters are:
--- the sample size
--- the standard deviation
--- the mean
--- the confidence level.
The margin of error (E) is calculated as follows:
So, we have:
The z-value for 90% confidence level is 1.645.
Substitute 1.645 for z
Take square roots
Multiply
Approximate
Hence, the margin of error is 0.29
Read more about margin of error at:
brainly.com/question/14396648
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the answer is 34 when you get a2 ans subtract the mineral you get a desemel and if you round that using the arcoulation sistum you get 34 hope this helps messege me if it dose
If you need the geometry and trigonometry I'll post those. Instead I found an answer at this link: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT6450/Class%20Projects/Scarpelli/Scarpelli_MathematicsBaseballActivity.....
The distance from home plate to the pitcher's mound is 60.5 feet and from home plate to second base is <span>127.28 feet.
Pitcher's Mound to 2nd base = </span><span>
<span>
<span>
66.78</span> </span>f</span>eet
Given those distances, we KNOW a 50 foot sprinkler will NOT reach home plate and second base from the pitcher's mound.
I didn't figure out the pitcher's mound to 1st or to 3rd, since the question is already answered.
Answer:
Yes, you can find the cube root of a negative number. The answer will be negative!
Step-by-step explanation:
Example: Find the cube root of -27
We know that a cube root is a number multiplied by itself 3 times (NOT MEANING THE NUMBER TIMES 3)
For example, The cube root of 27 positive is 3 because 3 x 3 x 3 = 27
But if we are using a negative number: It is really different because we got to know the rules.
The setup: -3 x -3 x -3 = -27
If we started with -3 x -3 first we know that a negative times a negative equals positive so the answer will be 9 positive, then we have this equation left:
9 x -3 = -27
The rule with this is a number times a negative is negative, so the answer of the question "Find the cube root of -27 is -3"
You didn't include the table but I found this table for the same statement, so I will answer you based on the next table:
Runner distance time
Arabella 7,299 feet 561 seconds
Bettina 3,425 yards 13 minutes, 12 seconds
Chandra 8,214 feet 0,195 hours
Divya 1,62 miles 732 seconds
To answer the question you must find the rate for each runner and then calculate the time to run 3.1 miles at each rate.
First you need to convert the data to obtain the rate in miles per second.
These are the main conversion identities:
1 mile = 5280 feet
1 mile = 1760 yards
1 hour = 3600 seconds
1 hour = 60 minutes
1 minute = 60 seconds
Arabella:
rate: 7,229 feet / 561 seconds * (1 mile / 5280 feet) =
= 0.00244 mile/second
Time to run 3.1 miles: V = d / t => t = d / V = 3.1 miles / 0.00244 mile/second = 1270 seconds
Bettina:
13 minutes + 12 seconds = 13*60 seconds +12 seconds = 792 seconds
rate = 3425 yards / 792 seconds * 1 mile / 1760 yards = 0.00246 mile/seconds
Time to run 3.1 miles = 3.1 miles / 0.00246 mile/second = 1260 seconds
Chandra:
rate = 8214 feet / 0.195 hours * 1 mile / 5280 feet * 1hour / 3600 seconds =
= 0.00222 seconds
Time = 3.1 mile / 0.00222 seconds = 0.389 hour = 1396 seconds
Divya:
rate = 1.62 miles / 732 seconds = 0.00221 seconds
Time = 3.1 mile / 0.00221 seconds = 1403 seconds
Now you can find the difference between fhe last and the first 1403 seconds - 1260 seconds = 143 seconds
That is equivalent to 2.38 seconds.
