1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
siniylev [52]
3 years ago
8

Help please, will give brainliest to best (and correct) answer!

Mathematics
2 answers:
vfiekz [6]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is f(x)=2(4)^x

Step-by-step explanation:

rjkz [21]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is f(x)=2(4)^x
You might be interested in
The length of each side of a square is 6 feet more than the length of a side of a regular Octagon. The perimeter of the square i
goldfiish [28.3K]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  • square: 12 ft sides
  • octagon: 6 ft sides

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem can be worked in your head.

If the perimeters of the square and regular octagon are the same, the side length of the 4-sided square must be the same as the length of 2 sides of the 8-sided octagon. Since the side of the square is 6 ft more than the side of the octagon, each side of the octagon must be 6 ft, and each side of the square must be 12 ft.

__

We can let s represent the side length of the octagon. Then we have ...

  8s = perimeter of octagon

  4(s +6) = perimeter of square

These are equal, so ...

  4(s +6) = 8s

  s +6 = 2s . . . . . . divide by 4

  6 = s . . . . . . . . . . subtract s

The octagon has 6-ft sides; the square has 12-ft sides.

8 0
3 years ago
Solve the system by substitution.<br> -2x + 7y = 15<br> бу = 3
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x + 7(1/2) =15

-4x +7 =30

-4x =23

x=-23/4

6 0
2 years ago
PLLLLEEEEAAASSSEEEE HHHEEELLLPPPP!!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Brut [27]

Answer:

1 and 5 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP!! WILL GIVE BRAINIEST + 30 POINTS!!
Goryan [66]

Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:

  1. Given
  2. Definition of rectangle.
  3. Definition of rectangle.
  4. By SAS Congruence Theorem.
  5. By CPCTC.

<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
  • A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
  • All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
  • The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.

Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.

Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.

In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:

  1. Given
  2. Definition of rectangle.
  3. Definition of rectangle.
  4. By SAS Congruence Theorem.
  5. By CPCTC.

Learn more about properties of rectangle on:

brainly.com/question/2835318

6 0
2 years ago
Is 0.25 rational or irrational
love history [14]
0.25 is rational because it is a terminating (means 'its stops') fraction.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • P=2a+3b+4c solve for c
    7·1 answer
  • Applying ratios and ptoportions today
    13·2 answers
  • What is the perimeter of triangle ABC ?
    11·2 answers
  • Four more than twice a number is 8
    8·1 answer
  • Can you simplify 8/144
    10·2 answers
  • Anyone know advanced linear algebra and modern algebra?
    5·1 answer
  • X^2+6x+4 equivalent
    12·1 answer
  • Answer don’t mind the stuff to there right——————
    11·2 answers
  • ......................
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following number 1001,1002,1004 will be the sum of 994 and a 2 digit number
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!