Available options are:
a. Normative influence
b. Door-in-the-face
c. Foot-in-the-door
d. Lowballing
Answer:
Option D. Lowballing Strategy
Explanation:
Lowballing strategy is when an organization advertises its low cost product or service and doesn't advertises the hidden costs to attract customers. The customer when interacts the company the sales team most likely make sales due to their experience. Such type of marketing products is common in printers whose cost is kept low whereas the tuner price is kept high which helps them to earn profit.
Answer:
13.5%
Explanation:
Relevant data provided for computing the profit margin which is here below:-
Net Income = $175,000
Net Sales = $1,300,000
The computation of profit margin is shown below:-
Profit Margin = (Net Income ÷ Net Sales) × 100
= ($175,000 ÷ $1,300,000) × 100
= 13.5%
Therefore for computing the profit margin we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Letter C is correct. <u>Person by situation interaction.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is a cognitive process that occurs through the individual perspective of each human being. This implies that our behavior is not totally conditioned by an automatic response predetermined by any variables, but what determines our way of being and acting is the set of learnings, memories, thoughts and perceptions about certain situations as well. as the process of social interaction, which determines how the experiences and actions lived by an individual in society will actively influence their tastes, actions and perceptions about society in general.
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.