A.Fractions and decimals are not integers<span>. All whole </span>numbers<span> are</span>integers<span> (and all natural </span>numbers<span> are </span>integers<span>), but not all </span>integers<span>are whole </span>numbers<span> or natural </span>numbers<span>. For example, -5 is an </span>integer<span>but not a whole </span>number<span> or a natural </span>number<span>.
B.</span><span>A </span>number<span> is </span>rational<span> if it can be represented as p q with p , q ∈ Z and q ≠ </span>0<span> . Any </span>number<span> which doesn't fulfill the above conditions is irrational. It can be represented as a ratio of two integers as well as ratio of itself and an irrational </span>number<span> such that </span>zero<span> is not dividend in any case
</span>C.<span>In mathematics, an </span>irrational number<span> is any </span>real number<span> that cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers. </span>Irrational numbers<span> cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals.
</span>D.<span>The correct answer is </span>rational<span> and </span>real numbers<span>, because all </span>rational numbers<span> are also </span>real<span>. Correct. The </span>number<span> is between integers, so it can't be an integer or a whole </span>number<span>. It's written as a ratio of two integers, so it's a </span>rational number<span> and not irrational.
</span> Witch one do u think it is??
Answer:
y = 1/4x - 4
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope is four points behind the origin, so we subtract -4 from the equation:
y = 1/4x - 4
For this case we have that by definition, the equation of the line of the slope-intersection form is given by:
Where:
m: It's the slope
b: It is the cut point with the y axis.
By definition, if two straight lines are parallel then their slopes are equal. Thus, the slope of the line sought will be 
We substitute the given point to find b:
Finally the line is:
Answer:
Answer:
x = -2
Step-by-step explanation:
For this problem, we must simply solve for x. To do this, we will need equation operations, and the use of the distributive property.
Let's work this line by line until we have the value for x:
3{-x + (2x + 1)} = x - 1
3*-x + 3*(2x + 1) = x - 1
-3x + 6x + 3 = x - 1
3x + 3 = x - 1
2x = -4
x = -2
Now we can check our answer for x by plugging back into the original equation and see if the left hand side is equal to the right hand side:
3{-x + (2x + 1)} = x - 1
3{-(-2) + (2(-2) + 1)} ?= (-2) - 1
3{2 + (-4 + 1)} ?= -3
3{2 + (-3)} ?= -3
3{-1} ?= -3
-3 == -3
Thus, we have found the solution for x to be equivalent to negative 2.
Cheers.
Answer:
4 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
12/3=4
1/3+4=4 1/3
