Let us assume that the number of beige tiles bought by Susan = B
Number of red tiles bought by Susan = R
Number of navy-blue tiles bought by Susan =N
Number of tiles bought altogether = 435
Now from the given question we know:
Number of red tiles bought is 25 more than the number of beige tiles.
So
R = 25 + B
Number of navy blue tiles bought is 3 times that of the number of beige tile bought
So
N = 3B
We already know that the total number of tiles bought is 435
Hence
B + R + N = 435
B + (25 + B) + 3B = 435
5B + 25 = 435
5B = 435 -25
5B = 410
B = 82
R = 25 + B
= 25 + 82
= 107
N = 3B
= 3 * 82
= 246
So the number of Beige tiles bought by Susan = 82
The number of red tiles bought by Susan = 107
The number of navy-blue tiles bought by Susan = 246
Given:
The equation is
To find:
The number of roots and discriminant of the given equation.
Solution:
We have,
The highest degree of given equation is 2. So, the number of roots is also 2.
It can be written as
Here, 
.
Discriminant of the given equation is
Since discriminant is 
, which is greater than 0, therefore, the given equation has two distinct real roots.
Answer:
The first box
Step-by-step explanation:
In a linear function you cannot have 2 of the same X numbers. Ex) You cannot have 2 -4's in the X row. In the Y, you may. But never the X.
The sides of a triangle must satisfy the triangle inequality, which states the sum of the lengths of any two sides is strictly greater than the length of the remaining side.
We really only have to check if the sum of the two smaller sides exceeds the largest side.
A. 5+6>7, ok
B. 6+6>10, ok
C. 7+7=14 Not ok, this is a degenerate triangle not a real triangle
D. 4+6>8 ok
Answer: C
Answer:
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC and given a chart with which Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate"
Step-by-step explanation:
