1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Likurg_2 [28]
4 years ago
9

Some of the misinformation given to us can constitute a stereotype. These stereotypes become "mental tapes" that affect what we

think and feel about situations, people and our environment. True of False
Social Studies
1 answer:
hoa [83]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:True

Explanation:This thing of being fed misinformation mostly start when we are still young from our families, communities, ethnic groups , provinces and countries.

For example when you grow up in a community dominated by a certain ethnic group your perspective of other ethnic group will be influenced by what you were told from a young age and it will keep playing in your mind even when you are an adult.

If you were told that particular ethnic group of people are stubborn and they don't like working when you start working with someone from that ethnic group this will be in your mind even if you don't want to be judgemental.

You might be interested in
How were the attacks on Constantinople in 1204 and 1453 different?
nalin [4]

Answer:

D. The Byzantine Empire recovered from the 1204 attack.

Explanation:

During the attack in 1204, part of Constantinople's capital city was destroyed by the Ottoman. But in the end, the Byzantine empire still managed to drive the ottoman out of important territories. That being said, Byzantine Empire still lost quite a few of their outer territories to the Ottoman.

The attack in 1453 on the other hand occurred after the Byzantine empire experienced the black plague that killed large portion of their population. This made their military became really week. In the end, the attack in 1453 marked the fall of Byzantine empire.

8 0
3 years ago
The main sociological critique of Malthusian and neo-Malthusian perspectives on population are___ Group of answer choices The la
Yuri [45]

Based on the following observations, the Malthusian theory was criticized: The population was growing quickly in Western Europe. The availability of food had also grown in the same period as a result of technological advancements. Food production has frequently expanded faster than population growth.

What are some criticisms of Neo-Malthusian theory?

Writers who argue that the Malthusian warnings were exaggerated or premature because the green revolution has significantly increased food production and will be able to keep up with ongoing population expansion have criticized the neo-Malthusian revival.

What are the main arguments against the Malthusian theory?

In essence, Malthus was mistaken about both population growth and technological advancement. Although he did not give an exact estimate, he suggested that in areas with plenty of natural resources (like The New World), the population would typically double every 25 years.

Learn more about Neo-Malthusian theory: brainly.com/question/13291281

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Zimbardo's simulation of prison life provided a dramatic demonstration of the power of _____ on behavior. individuation norms ro
Goryan [66]
<span>Zimbardo's simulation of prison life provided a dramatic demonstration of the power of "roles" on behavior. 


</span>There are numerous ways that individuals can impact our behavior, yet maybe a standout amongst the most imperative is that the nearness of others appears to set up desires. One manner by which these desires wind up obvious is the point at which we take a gander at the parts that individuals play in the public eye. Social parts are the part individuals play as individuals from a social gathering. With every social part you receive, your conduct changes to fit the desires both you and others have of that part.
5 0
4 years ago
Children typically outgrow temper tantrums and disobedient, disregardful, argumentative, hostile, or deliberately annoying behav
nalin [4]

Answer: oppositional defiant disorder

Explanation: idk

7 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the Ottoman Empire gain wealth and power.
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Trade and Military.

Explanation:

The Ottoman Empire gained wealth with trade. They took control of important trade routes (for example, capturing Constantinople) and had them (Europeans) pay high taxes. They exported furs, tobacco, silk, cotton, and silk.

The Ottoman Empire was available to gain power with its military. The military was strong for using new technology like gunpowder. In order to be successful to raid areas and gain power, they must have had a strong and big military.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Michael wants to go to medical school because he sincerely wants to help others. To achieve his goal, he studies hard to keep up
    10·1 answer
  • What is a major risk of using a financial institution?
    8·2 answers
  • The voyage of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic to the Americas was known as the
    14·1 answer
  • What causes the difference in physical characteristics like hair color among people
    5·1 answer
  • Why might leaders on the arabian peninsula be concerned about changes in the price of oil?
    7·1 answer
  • The reason delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention moved to a federalist system is they recognized the system of governm
    6·1 answer
  • Which ocean to which ocean would an explorer go, if he was sailing east around the cape of good hope
    12·1 answer
  • In 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt established the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve on the Kaibab Plateau in northern Ariz
    5·1 answer
  • What type of climate is created by the Norwegian Current?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the full form of AIPMT<br><br><br>bored here????​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!