Answer:
b. $80,000
Explanation:
The computation of the deferred portion of its provision for income taxes should be given below:
= $300,000 ÷ 3 years
= $100,000
Now
= 30% of $100,000 + 25% of $100,000 + 25% of $100,000
= $30,000 + $25,000 + $25,000
= $80,000
Therefore the option b is correct
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer:
implementing a job rotation program.
Explanation:
An auto manufacturing plant will have a process of production that promotes division of labour an monotony at work.
One of the disadvantages of division of labour is that it creates monotony, and the workers become bored with their jobs.
However if the workers on the company create a job rotation program, monotony will be reduced.
They will be engaged on different job roles that will make their jobs more exciting. This will result in increased productivity as they are more engaged at work.
I would consider demographics, education level, and methods of communication
