Answer:
Increase.
Explanation:
In Economics, there are primarily two (2) factors which affect the availability and the price at which goods and services are sold or provided, these are demand and supply.
The law of demand states that, the higher the demand for goods and services, the higher the price it would be sold all things being equal.
According to the law of demand, there exist a negative relationship between the quantity of goods or services demanded and the price of goods or services i.e when the prices of goods and services in the market increases or rises: there would be a significant decline or fall in the demand for this goods and services.
This ultimately implies that, an increase in the price level of a product usually results in a decrease in the quality of real output demanded along the aggregate demand curve.
In this scenario, an increase in health consciousness increases the demand for fitness centers across the country. Other things being equal (ceteris paribus), we can expect the wages of fitness instructors to increase because their services would be sought or demanded by the trainers.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Change in the inventory = $1,030,000
i.e Opening inventory = $1,030,000
Income tax rate = 35%
So, the cumulative effect in the year 2018 is
Opening inventory $1,030,000
Less: income tax rate i.e 35% -$360,500
Balance $699,500
This balance would be addition to the beginning balance of the retained earning statement
Answer:
The indicators may be an important factor will be the unemployment rate in the area
Explanation:
The federal tax rate in the that area, may no different that in other area and it can be pay if you have job, the other indicator could be is the producer price index but it can't tell you the economy as well just the productions and finally the CMI consume marginal index tell you more about life style in the zone, so that's why the indicator that is higgher influence is the unemployment rate because that determinate how many people around can pay and be able to grow economy way in the area, so t you can get return on investment
The correct option is (b) negligent hiring.
State courts have ruled that companies can be held liable for negligent hiring if they fail to do adequate background checks.
<h3>What is negligent hiring doctrine?</h3>
According to the doctrine of negligent hiring, a company is responsible for any injury its workers do to third parties if they knew or should have known that the employee posed a danger of doing so, or if a reasonable investigation would have revealed the risk.
The causes of negligence hiring are-
- Whether the employee's unfitness was the cause of the injuries that resulted
- Whether the employer knew or should have known (had the employer used ordinary care) of the employee's unfitness at the time of employment. Each state has a different liability standard.
An employer be concerned about negligent hiring and retention because-
- An employer may be liable for real injuries, pain and suffering, and even punitive damages if they fail to discipline an employee who poses a danger of injury to coworkers, clients, and others.
- The company may be held liable if these employees go on to commit careless or reckless conduct that could endanger others.
The elements of a negligent retention claim include all of the following:
- An affiliation with a company.
- The employee's lack of expertise.
- The employer may have had actual or constructive awareness of the ineptitude.
- An employee's action or inaction that resulted in the plaintiff's injuries.
To know more about the negligent hiring with example, here
brainly.com/question/24208900
#SPJ4
The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
