Answer
Cameron forgot to do the same thing to the 9. Instead of dividing 3 by 3 and 9 by 3 he only divided 3 by 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
3/7 × 4/9
You can divide the 3 and 9 by 3 so you get 1/7 × 4/3.
Then you do 4 × 1 and 7 × 3.
Correct answer is 4/21
<h3>Answer:
10000 in base 5</h3>
====================================================
Explanation:
4+1 = 5 in base 10
But in base 5, the digit "5" does not exist.
The only digits in base five are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
This is similar to how in base ten, the digits span from 0 to 9 with the digit "10" not being a thing (rather it's the combination of the digits "1" and "0" put together).
----------------
Anyways let's go back to base 5.
Instead of writing 4+1 = 5, we'd write 4+1 = 10 in base 5. The first digit rolls back to a 0 and we involve a second digit of 1.
Think how 9+1 = 10 in base 10.
Similarly,
44+1 = 100 in base 5
444+1 = 1000 in base 5
4444+1 = 10000 in base 5
and so on.
----------------
Here are the first few numbers in base 5, when counting up by 1 each time.
0, 1, 2, 3, 4,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
30, 31, 32, 33, 34,
40, 41, 42, 43, 44,
100, 101, 102, 103, ...
Notice each new row is when the pattern changes from what someone would expect in base 10. This is solely because the digit "5" isn't available in base 5.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equation is
2y = 3x + 10
3x - 2y + 10 = 0 .....i)
Any line parallel to line I) is
3x - 2y + k = 0 ......ii)
As the line two passes through the point ( 2 , - 5 ) Now substituting the values
3 * 2 - 2 * ( - 5) + k = 0
6 + 10 + k = 0
16 + k = 0
k = - 16
Now putting the value of k in equation two
3x - 2y + 16 = 0 is the required equation.
Hope it will help :)❤
Indirect proof or contradiction
Are there choices to pick from?
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
If they have no solutions, the lines must not intersect.
If they don't intersect, they must be parallel
