The two scholars contended that human behavior is not consistent as laymen and professional psychologists views it. They argued that research shows that behavior is not consistent. This inconsistency according to them is consistent and therefore can be used to predict human behavior.
Specific Description. It's neither biased nor inappropriate, since both are factually true and informing about Stephanie. And it's not a cliched statement either.
Answer:
The options are given below:
A. discriminatory regulation
B. heuristic
C. illusory correlation
D. foot-in-the-door model
The correct option is C. illusory correlation
Explanation:
In the field of psychology, illusory correlation refers to the phenomenon in which people perceive a relationship or connection between variables even when such relationship or connection do not exist. Oftentimes, people tend to attach a particular behavior or actions to a particular set of people, for example, when a person believes that people who live urban environments are rude. This belief will make the person think that every rude person they meet, lives in the city, rather than a rural area.
Therefore, in the scenario given above, where people assume there exists a relationship between violence and mental illnesses, when in fact, there is none, we say it is an Illusory Correlation.
Explanation:
to have been in an error, and to have persisted in it, when it is detected, ruins both reputation and fortune.
Sorry I can’t see them right
