Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

11

True or false created during the great depression, the federal deposit insurance program resulted in a large number of bank fail

ures.?

1 answer:

Ainat [17]3 years ago

7 0

False. This is not a true thing.

You might be interested in

lord [1]

Answer:

$

Material used 2,500

Direct labour 5,000

Overhead applied 200

Cost of goods sold 7,700

Explanation:

The overhead applied is the difference between cost of goods sold and cost of material used and direct labour. The cost of goods sold is $7,700 while the cost of material and labour is $7,500. The difference of $200 represents the overhead applied.

7 0

3 years ago

What are the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study? What options does the woman have, and what should she

Dovator [93]

The integrity, ethics, and law issues raised in the case study are illegal and unethical conduct.

The woman must reject the economic proposal made by the company and maintain her complaint so that the executive is judged for what she did because she would avoid future harm to other employees.

<h3>What is ethics? </h3>

Ethics is a term that refers to moral philosophy. This focuses on the study of human behavior based on right and wrong according to duty. Contemporary ethics is usually divided into three branches which are:

Metaethics studies the origin, nature, and meaning of ethical concepts.
Normative ethics seeks norms or standards to regulate human conduct.
Applied ethics examines specific ethical controversies.

According to the above, it can be inferred that the situation presented is an example of an unethical and illegal act because the company and the executive want to bribe the employee to prevent the executive from being removed from his position and the company from being judged for endorsing that conduct of the executive.

Note: The question is incomplete because the information is missing. Here is the complete information:

Case study 4

A woman is sexually harassed by a top-level senior executive in a large company. She sues the company, and during settlement discussions she is offered an extremely large monetary settlement. In the agreement, the woman is required to confirm that the executive did nothing wrong, and after the agreement is signed the woman is prohibited from discussing anything about the incident publicly. Before the date scheduled to sign the settlement agreement, the woman's lawyer mentions that she has heard the executive has done this before, and the settlement amount is very large because the company probably had a legal obligation to dismiss the executive previously. The company however wants to keep the executive because he is a big money maker for the company.

What are the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study? What options does the woman have, and what should she do and why?

Lecturer Guidelines

Some of the issues raised by this case study include initial issues of unethical and unlawful conduct, by the executive and the company; whether the company should allow the executive to continue working because of the revenue he generates, in view of his propensity to harm co-workers, and whether this action is ethical or reflects integrity; whether the company should require the woman to state that the executive did nothing wrong as part of the settlement agreement; whether the woman should agree to this settlement in view of the harm future employees are being exposed to; and whether the woman is prioritising justice for herself over harm to future employees in an acceptable way.

Learn more about ethics in: brainly.com/question/2630782

3 0

3 years ago

When LIFO is used with the periodic inventory system, cost of goods sold is assigned costs from the most recent purchases at the

bija089 [108]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The assertion is false that when LIFO is used with the periodic inventory system, cost of goods sold is assigned costs from the most recent purchases at the point of each sale, rather than from the most recent purchases for the period.

Under this method it is <u>at the end of the accounting year that the Inventory account is adjusted to equal the cost of the merchandise that is unsold.</u>

It is important to note that under LIFO periodic (not LIFO perpetual) <u>we wait until the entire year is over before assigning the costs. </u>Then we flow the year's last costs first, even if those goods arrived after the last sale of the year.

4 0

3 years ago

The most recent financial statements for Assouad, Inc., are shown here: Income Statement Balance Sheet Sales $ 11,100 Current as

Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

EXTERNAL FINANCING NEEDED IS $383.736

Explanation:

For calculating the external financing , we first have to take out what the sales , cost , asset , liability will be when the sales of the company increases by 17%, so now we have to calculate all the values -

SALES = $11,100 X 1.17 ( multiplying by 17% because of increase in sale)

= $12,987

COST = $7900 X 1.17 (multiplying by 17%)

= $9243

INCOME BEFORE TAX = SALES - COST

= $12,987 - $9243

= $3744

TAXES AT 24% ON TAXABLE INCOME OF $3744

= .24 X $3744 =$ 898.56

Now subtracting this amount from taxable income

$3744 - $898.56 = $2,845.44

Next step would be of paying dividend payout ratio from it

40% of $2,845.44 = .40 x $2845.44

= $1138.176

RETAINED EARNINGS = Taxable income - Dividend payout

= $2845.44 - $1138.176

= $1707.264

NOW TOTAL ASSETS WOULD BE = $15,600(5400+10200) X 1.17

= $18,252

IT IS GIVEN IN THE QUESTION THAT COST, ASSET, LIABILITY(CURRENT) ARE ALL PROPORTIONAL TO SALES.

CURRENT LIABILITY = $3300 X 1.17

= $3861

TOTAL COST = LONG TERM LIABILITY + CURRENT LIABILITY

=$4820 + $3861

= $8681

TOTAL EQUITY EQUAL = $7480 + $1707.264 (RETAINED EARNINGS)

= $9187.264

EXTERNAL FINANCING = ASSET - LIABILITY - EQUITY

= $18,252 - $8681 - $9187.264

= $383.736

4 0

3 years ago

Reserves decrease if the Federal Reserve?a. raises the discount rate or auctions more credit. b. raises the discount rate but no

sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

D. lowers the discount rate but not if it auctions more credit

Explanation:

Discount rate adjustment and Federal Reserve's auction have the following effects on reserves.

Discount rate adjustment: a <em>higher discount rate</em> will encourage investment in the US economy, thus leading to <em>increased reserves</em> as investment inflows increase.

On the other hand, a <em>lower discount rate</em> encourages investment outflow into other jurisdictions with higher yields, <em>thus reducing reserves</em>.

Auction: <em>auctioning more credit</em> will result in the movement of investment flows into the Federal Reserve (<em>an increase in reserves</em>) as investors invest in auctions. Vice versa.

Therefore, a mix of lower discount rate and not auctioning more credit will result in lower reserves.

8 0

3 years ago