The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete and does not provide any options or further references, we can say that some might see that as a problem because of the following: "All states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won."
To understand this answer we have to include the following idea. The scenario described in this question is a supposed presidential election organized in 2028. There are two candidates. Democratic Senator Rosa Marcus and Republican candidate Ted Torres. Marcus was declared victorious after having 5 more Electoral votes than Torres. With those 5 more votes, candidate Marcus reaches the 270 votes needed for the Electoral College could get a winner in the election. So with that context, the kind of adjustment needed in the Electoral College to change a situation like this would be that all states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won.
The answer is A. Catholic leaders grouped up and wanted to respond to the concerns of the new Protestants.
They both explored north america manly canada
<span>C) When a strike threatens the public welfare, the federal government is expected to step in.
This was represented in the Coal Strike of 1902 where the government stepped in.
Hope this helps :)</span>
<span>During the Cold War, the US did everything it could to stop the spread of Communism. It believed at that time in the 'Domino Theory' that if one country fell to Communism, all countries in the area would do so.
</span>
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.