Answer:
The difference between two securities is 0.89%.
Explanation:
Inflation premium for the next three and five years:
Inflation premium (3) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85%) ÷ 3
= 2.83%
Inflation premium (5) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85% + 3.85% + 3.85%) ÷ 5
= 3.24%
Real risk-free rate = 2.35%
Since default premium and liquidity premium are zero on treasury bonds, we can now solve for the maturity risk premium:
Three-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (3) + MRP(3)
6.80% = 2.35% + 2.83% + MRP(3)
MRP (3) = 1.62%
Similarly,
5-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (5) + MRP(5)
8.10% = 2.35% + 3.24% + MRP(3)
MRP (5) = 2.51%
Thus,
MRP5 - MRP3 = 2.51% - 1.62%
= 0.89%
Therefore, the difference between two securities is 0.89%.
Answer:
Value-Added.
Explanation:
A value-added perspective on quality involves a subjective assessment of the efficacy of every step on the process for the customer. A value-added perspective on quality is a strategic business approach in which businesses engage in activities that brings value, benefits or satisfaction to the consumer of its goods and services, to achieve this goal, business managers usually ensures that the manufacturing and distribution process or steps are effective and efficient.
Answer:
The answer is option B) The Delphi technique is a useful way to gather opinions from experts who desire anonymity.
Explanation:
The Delphi method seeks to collate opinions from a diverse set of experts, and it can be done without having to bring everyone together for a physical meeting.
Since the responses of the participants are anonymous, individual panelists don't have to worry about the consequences of their opinions.
Consensus takes time since opinions are carefully analyzed, making the method very effective.
It is an exclusive process used to arrive at a group opinion or decision by surveying a panel of experts.
Experts respond to several rounds of questionnaires, and the responses are aggregated and shared with the group after each round.
The experts can adjust their answer each round, based on how they interpret the group response provided to them to assess.
The ultimate result is meant to be a true consensus of what the group thinks whilst retaining the anonymity of the respondents.
Answer:
$36,000
Explanation:
The computation of the lggie's salary is shown below:
= (Iggie salary in 1974) × (2003 price index ÷ 1974 price index)
= ($10,000) × (180 ÷ 50)
= $10,000 × 3.6
= $36,000
Since we have to compute the 2003 salary based on 1974 salary so we consider the 1974 salary and took the 2003 price index as a numerator and 1974 price index as a denominator.
