It is Very Obvious. Americans Fighting Isis and Cites and towns being invaded and blown the heck up.
Whites and free blacks from the North were most often the teachers in Freedmen's Bureau schools.
Freedmen's Bureau was a sort of a shelter from former slaves who had nowhere else to go to. They could come to the Bureau and stay there, get some food and clothing, and later, even education. Schools were opened in the Bureau, and many white people from the North (as well as educated black former slaves) came here to educate them.
Based on the description, <span> this is an example of: Stimulus generalization
</span>Stimulus generalization happens if people start to develop a tendency to react if they're exposed to a certain stimulus, no matter what the context is.
In this case, the green light served as a stimulus for the driver before he decided to do the actions
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
