Answer:
The answer is inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is based on observation. The arguments for the conclusion may <u>not</u> be completely certain, and thus the conclusion is only <u>probably</u> true. In the example, it's possible that Rhea's uncle doesn't like music, but it's <u>not</u> necessarily true.
In contrast, deductive reasoning is based on absolute certainty, which make the conclusion necessarily true. An example: we need air to breathe > there is no air underwater > we cannot breathe underwater.
A. Michael Dell
He helped launch and led the personal computer revolution in the 1980s.
His outlook on the technology industry and supply chain innovations he led at the helm of Dell changed the IT industry forever.
Answer:
Identical twin
Explanation:Twins are usually formed from the same fertilized egg(ova) . This means they share the same physical characteristics and also behave alike . Non-identical twins are formed from different fertilized eggs which makes their behavior and physical features different.
This explains why Jared personality will most likely resemble that of his twin brother despite living in a different environment.
Answer: Option D. DES (Diethylstilbestrol)
Explanation:
Diethylstilbestrol was given to pregnant women to prevent complications during pregnancy. These could include having a miscarriage or giving birth too early. There were possibilities that the daughters of the women who used DES to prevent miscarriage were more likely to get a certain kind of cancer of the vagina and cervix. Diethylstilbestrol, or DES, is a synthetic form of estrogen. Estrogen is a female hormone. DES was given to millions of pregnant women between 1938 and 1971.
Answer:
Reflectivism
Explanation:
Reflectivism is normally used in International Relations theory for several reasons. This term covers a wide range of theoretical approaches that is in contrast with the rational-choice accounts of social phenomena and positivism. It is usually encouraged by constructivist/deconstructivist when trying to get better understanding of reality by asking yourself tough questions, rather than relying on the approach of a positivist.