In a command economy, it is the b) government who decides what goods will be produced.
Answer:
Varies
Explanation:
They can go against natural resources.
Answer:
C) $0 $285,000
Explanation:
The §121 exclusion establishes that homeowners can exclude from their capital gains taxes the sale of their property for a maximum of $250,000 gain (or $500,000 for joint filers) if they meet two criteria:
- they owned the property for at last 5 years
- they use the property as main residence for at least 2 years (they can aggregate time periods).
So if Eric and Katie use the §121 exclusion they wouldn't pay any capital gains tax ($500,000 is higher than $375,000).
If they decide to forgo the §121 exclusion, then they will have to pay taxes for a gain of:
capital gain = net sale price - asst basis
capital gain = ($375,000 - $10,000) - $80,000 = $365,000 - $80,000 = $285,000
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The <u>statement is true</u> as we know according to CP-38 Commission Position toward Disclosure concerning Affiliated Business Arrangements as well as Conflicts, the comment additions Rule E-46 Affiliated Business Arrangements. §12-61-113.2, C.R.S. Affiliated Business Arrangements was established in Colorado to produce clarity, accountability, moreover customer protection during disclosure moreover regularity concerning affiliated marketing adjustments. Affiliated business organizations have also been organized for various years by the RESPA.
Answer:
Legal obligation will arise from inadvertence of one thing or a deliberate act. There are 3 categories of erroneous conduct lawfully. Its fissure of agreement, corruption and one who is pretentious or abraded thanks to the act of additional person.
(1)
The necessities that the automobile should demonstrate to carry mister. Embarrassed of carelessness are as per RES IPSA LOQUITUR belief. The belief RES IPSA LOQUITUR suggests that "the factor expresses for himself". In keeping with this opinion, the broken or damage himself is that the resistant and it expresses for the performance of the inattention. This belief needs the subsequent things:
- The affair or act ought to happen thanks to the carelessness
- the carelessness ought to cause some injury or damage
- the litigant ought to have fashionable management over the device or instrumentality.
- The casualty shouldn't have underwrote something to the carelessness.
(2)
Permitting to the law of carelessness, underneath request of householders and operatives of vehicles, P. Suppliers are control lawfully chargeable for the grievance to the automobile. In keeping with this, the vendor of vehicle United Nations agency energies sloppily and origins grievance is liable for the obligation produced to the broken individual. The proprietor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. Enclose if the worker of the car isn't the proprietor then the possessor is not liable for the act of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case, agency association exists. Thus, P Distributors are control chargeable for the injury to the celebration.
(b)
The possessor of vehicle United Nations agency drives inaccurately and causes grievance is liable for the liability produced to the broken individual. The possessor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. In case, if the worker of the car isn't the possessor then the proprietor is not liable for the performance of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case each belief of RES IPSA LOQUITUR and regulation of carelessness are pertinent. Thus, the Mr. Tom is control chargeable for the performance of his partner.
