Answer:
Julie
The percent of her monthly income that will be budgeted for transportation is:
= 13%.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Amount budgeted for transportation = $175
Amount being spent on transportation = $250
Total monthly income = $1,900
Percentage of monthly income that will be budgeted for transportation = $250/$1,900 * 100
= 13.16%
= 13.2%
= 13%
Percentage of monthly income earlier budgeted for transportation = 9% ($175/$1,900 * 100)
The additional spending on transportation represents 4% ($75/$1,900 * 100)
New percentage spending on transportation = 13% (9% + 4%)
Answer: True
Explanation:
Groupware is a set of programs that makes it possible for people to work together on a common course even though they are at different locations from each other. In this way, they can work together remotely.
Computer programs that makes work collaboration to be possible real time are known as synchronous groupware.
Groupware provides computer-mediated communication systems, allowing different viewpoints and ideas to be compared and discussed in real time.
False, since both roles are in the capacity of research and does not compromise results. So there is no conflict of interest in research.
Conflicts of interest are situations in which professional judgments or actions regarding a primary concern, such as a medical researcher's responsibilities, may be easily persuaded by a secondary interest, such as monetary benefit or professional advancement.
Many doctors work full-time for biotech and pharmaceutical companies, as well as medical device manufacturers. They work in research, product development, or administration. In fact, a few of them own the businesses. This is not conflict of interest.
Learn more on conflict of interest-
brainly.com/question/14940595
#SPJ4
Answer:
J.S. Bach used some dynamic terms, including forte, piano, più piano, and pianissimo (although written out as full words), and in some cases it may be that ppp was considered to mean pianissimo in this period.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.