I believe the answer is: <span>nonverbal behaviors
For example, stutter and inability to maintain eye contact could be considered as a sign that the person lying.
On top of that, liars often shows signs of physical discomfort while doing it such as causing them to touch the back of the neck or constantly scratching their heads.</span><span />
Answer:
D
Explanation:
We get bits of info througn our ears, mouth, nose and skin
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are as follows:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an _________ offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
a. a problem
b. an indigent
c. a contract
d. an assigned
e. an at risk
Answer:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an b. indigent offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
Explanation:
An indigent can be defined as someone who does not have the means and resources to provide the basic necessities of life, such as food and clothing. Likewise, an indigent offender is someone who does not have sufficient income to afford an attorney. In such cases, the court appoints and pays for the lawyer to represent the offender. This is actually a quite common occurrence, sometimes reaching the number of 82% of court appointed lawyers for felony defendants.
Answer:
Be a proud quitter!
Explanation:
A Gambler is nothing but a man who makes his living out of false hope.
There is a very easy way to return from a casino with a small fortune: Go there with a large one.
Gambling: The sure way of getting nothing from something.
The best throw of dice is to throw them away.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
