It is log-linear which is the best fit to the data?
Answer:
This is a stratified random sample because a separate random sample is selected from each class
Explanation:
Stratified random sampling is an appropriate method when the population consists of mixed characteristics and you would like to ensure that every characteristic is proportionally represented in the sample. In this example, the population is the students from Central High School and the mixed characteristics are the different classes such as Freshman students, Sophomore students, Juniors and Seniors.
After the population is divided into subgroups based on characteristics, from the overall proportion of the population, you calculate how many people should be sampled in each subgroup. Random or systematic sampling can then be used to select a sample from each subgroup.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>Setting a Goal = B
</u>
Basis the past data and knowledge, 90 seconds is set as target for maximum time to hold
.
<u>Developing a Action Plan = A
</u>
The contingent call center workers are hired for anytime service and support to ensure hold time is less than 90 seconds
.
<u>Reviewing progress = C
</u>
In mid of the project, review is done to check how many times hold time exceeded 90 seconds
.
<u>Appraising performance = D
</u>
It is done at the end post project completion with data and results
.
Answer:
Direct material quantity variance= $10,980 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard Price or Rate Direct materials 8.5 kilos $ 6.00 per kilo
The company reported the following results concerning this product in August. Actual output 3,200 units Raw materials used in production 29,030 kilos Purchases of raw materials 31,600 kilos. Actual cost of raw materials purchases $ 195,920
Direct material quantity variance= (standard quantity - actual quantity)*standard price
Standard quantity= 8.5*3,200= 27,200 kg
Actual quantity= 29,030kg
Standard price= $6
Direct material quantity variance= (27,200 - 29,030)*6= $10,980 unfavorable
Answer:
Anne Mullens committed embezzlement.
Explanation:
Embezzlement is defined as misappropriation of funds by someone with whom funds have been entrusted.
It is a theft as the money does not belong to the perpetrator. The perpetrator is only entrusted with funds.
One of the conditions for embezzlement is an existence of a fiduciary (trust) relationship between parties.
In the given case, Anne Mullens pocketed $57 cash from recorded amount instead of recording 57$ customer's payment via check. Instead she included the customer's check in the money to be taken to bank.
This is embezzlement of funds by Anne.
