The primary distinction between taxonomy and systematics is that taxonomy is concerned with the classification and naming of creatures, whereas systematics is concerned with the determination of organisms' evolutionary relationships. This means that systematics determines whether or not different organisms share a common ancestor.
Prokaryotes are single-celled organisms with no nucleus, and so this would make bacteria a prime example. Therefore, depending upon the system being used, the kingdom that contains single-celled prokaryotes could be Monera, or the combination of Archaeobacteria and Eubacteria.
The kingdom systems, which were previously taught in high school, consisted of a 5-kingdom system which was later expanded to 6. The 5- kingdom included Animals, Plants, Fungi, Monera and Protists. The 6- kindgom system expanded Monera into Archaeobacteria and Eubacteria.
The "kingdom" system of classification is now generally not recognized as a valid or helpful way of classification, at least not according to modern evidence. It tends to be "paraphyletic", meaning that it describes relationships which do not match the evolutionary relationships of the organisms being described, and tends to favor human conventions rather than biological evidence. Kingdoms have generally been replaced by "domains" in terms of organizing relationships between organisms, referring to the prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and archaea, based on genetic and protein data.
The results will most likely be valid because the scientists kept getting the same results after REPEATED experiments. If they just conducted one experiment then they would not have been sure if what happened was a fluke or if another thing would happen after another experiment.<span />
Answer:
its a because the alphabet start off with a
Explanation:
^^^ you welcome
