Answer:
Retail value is also known as the sticker value.
The answer is there are 6 possible outcomes: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Hope this helps!
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
EF = 58/7
Step-by-step explanation:
If you extend both BC and AD to meet at P you get 3 similar triangles PAB, PEF, and PCD. Let's call BF = 3x and FC = 4x. Therefore the following proportions can be expressed:
BP/7 = (BP+7x)/10
10BP = 7*(BP+7x)
10BP = 7BP+49x
3BP = 49x
BP = (49/3)x
BP/7 = (BP+3x)/EF
EF = (BP+3x)*7/BP
EF = ((49/3)x + 3x)*7/((49/3)x)
EF = ((58/3)x*7*3)/(49x)
EF = 58/7
is the inequality that describes this problem
<h3><u>Solution:</u></h3>
Given that Travis can spend no more than $125.75 every month
To find: linear inequality that describes the problem
Let the amount spent on movies = x dollars
Given that Travis decided to spend 4.3 times as much money on video games as he spends on movies
Amount spent on video games = 4.3 (amount spent on movies)
Amount spent on video games = 4.3x
Travis can spend no more than $125.75. That is, he can spend less than or equal to $125.75
<em><u>Thus, the inequality representing the situation is:</u></em>
Thus the required inequality is found
