Answer:
Buy a store
Explanation:
If you buy a store, then you become a store owner.
You were probably looking for more detail, but this is the best I can do for now.
Answer:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Explanation:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is the value of payments at a specific date in the future based on the payments being recurring and assuming a discount rate. The future value of an annuity (FVA) is based on regular cash flow. The higher the discount rate, the greater the annuity's future value.
Where:
FVA is The future value of an annuity (FVA)
P is payment per period
n is the number of period
r is the discount rate
Given that:
P = $195
r = 4% = 0.04
n = 4 years
substituting values
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Answer:
Creative Sound Systems should report $18,800,000 as net cash flows from financing activities
Explanation:
Cash flow Financing activities are the funds that the business acquire or paid to finance its main activities, these involve borrowing and repaying short-term loans, long-term loans and other long-term liabilities.
From the question, Cash inflow from Issue of common share and Cash outflow from purchase of treasury stock are the only recognizable Financing activities
Particulars Amount
Cash inflow from Issue of common share $39,600,000
Cash outflow from purchase of treasury stock -$20,800,000
Net cash flows from financing activities $18,800,000
Answer:
C) automatically produces documentation of software installed on each client computer
Explanation:
Desktop management refers to managing all the company's computers. Even though the word desktop is used, it includes managing and overseeing all the devices of the organization including laptops, tablets and even smartphones. Desktop management is a part of systems management.
Answer: Trained incapacity
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the idea that after gaining a certain kind of education, skill or experience etc. the level of thinking of an individual cannot go beyond a certain limit.
In the given case, the manager was the upper level employee and was not habitual to the work that was performed by the workers in the restaurant.
Therefore this position in the workplace limited his skills of performing only the managerial work.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the above case depicts trained incapacity.
