B because 6 times 2 is 12...
Notice the following pattern:
2 - 0 = 2
6 - 2 = 4
12 - 6 = 6
20 - 12 = 8
It's reasonable to assume that consecutive terms in the sequence differ by increasing multiples of 2, so that for the next number (call it x) we expect to see
x - 20 = 10 ==> x = 30
and for the number after that (call it y) we would see
y - x = y - 30 = 12 ==> y = 42
You can either write 2.4 as 12/5 ( an improper fraction) or as 2(2/5) (a mixed number).
Answer: C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A, B, C
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: "AB ≅ DE, AC ≅ DF, and ∠A ≅ ∠D"
A. Given.
This is the information that was given in the problem statement.
Step 2: "ΔABC ≅ ΔDEF"
B. Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS)
The SAS postulate says that if two triangles have a pair of congruent angles between two pairs of congruent sides, then the triangles must be congruent. From the previous step, we can conclude the triangles are congruent.
Step 3: "∠C ≅ ∠F"
C. Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent (CPCTC)
In Step 2, we established the triangles are congruent. So now we can conclude that the corresponding angles are congruent.
