Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.
Answer:
a. Undifferentiated products and variable prices in the various channels.
Explanation:
Horizontal Channel Conflicts arises when there is disagreement between two or more members of the channel. If the toy manufacturer sells toys to toy store and department stores, a possible reason for disagreement could be on variable price among the two channels.
Answer:
The correct answer is B) low-cost provider strategies, broad differentiation strategies, best-cost provider strategies.
Explanation:
A competitive advantage allows one company to produce or sell goods more effectively than another company. For that reason, entrepreneurs always try to develop competitive strategies that help them maintain that advantage.
According to researcher researcher Michael E. Porter, there are at least four types of competitive strategies: differentiation, cost leader, low cost approach, and low cost differentiation. Each entrepreneur can use one of these standard strategies or develop his own strategy since flexibility is an important characteristic of competitive strategies, although the reality is that most companies use one of these four generic strategies.
Answer:
C. Both (i) and (ii) are true
Explanation:
Under perfect price discrimination, consumer surplus doesn't exist since the supplier is selling the good or service at the maximum price that each consumer is willing to pay. This situation maximizes supplier surplus.
Under perfect competition, both supplier and consumer surplus exist.
Since total social surplus = supplier surplus + consumer surplus, total surplus should be the same in both situations.
