Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
A is the answer because to find a area you need to multiply each side
Answer:Let's contrast relationships that are and are not proportional in four different ways. ... starfish; centipedes; earthworms; dinosaurs ... legs; eyes; neurons; digits ... does not have a constant of proportionality that you can multiply by any number in
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
If f(x) =x, is the father function, then all it's child function would be equally inclined to x and y-axis respectively.