God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
Machiavellian virtue this is a political virtue that responds to the appeal of the public world. More than a virtue, it is a virtuosity - it is the skill that, in Machiavelli's view, anyone who aspires to be a great political leader must have. Someone with the talent, creativity and willingness to respond to the call of his time and to rise to it.
They are similar theories, which resemble the form of morality and virtue and differ in the way one sees them.
Answer:
Torts
Explanation:
Torts -
It is the act by which the a person can be legally be punished for any tortious activity , which can cause harm or loss to any other person , is referred to as torts.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The company selling defective appliance , which can catch fire , and hence , these types of civil wrongs are called torts.
