Answer:
Organisms interact with each other and their ecosystem constantly, producing a constant flow of energy and matter.
Explanation:
Each of the living things on our planet needs energy and matter to survive. In order to do this, they must interact with the environment around them.
This is where sunlight, the climate of a habitat, water and even other living beings come into play.
The energy is constantly renewed in the ecosystems of these living beings, however matter does not. We can find matter in living beings that die, and this is where decomposing organisms appear. They are in charge of releasing disposable and decomposed matter into the atmosphere, which after being released will be used by the producing organisms.
Basically matter and energy are the basic components of the food chain, where matter is transferred and energy is renewed.
Answer: The answer would be ''Mobilization''.
Explanation: The US army was a force that was mobilized considering the fact that many young men were needed for the war against the opposing forces which would have brought upon an end to the world as the people knew it.
Hope this has helped you, luv!! Goodluck! :-)
Answer:
The desire for a new Constitution was borne out of some of the lapses of the Articles of Confederation which produced a weak central government. In 1787, representatives from 12 states from the existing 13 states in the United States converged to draft the new U.S Constitution. Several deliberations were made to form a better and stronger system of government. However, two alliances were formed at that time as a faction. One was the Federalists and the other was the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. They wanted a sizable amount of representation in government among states based on their population.
During the process of ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights need not be part of the Constitution. They believed that with the addition of the Bill of Rights, the rights of citizens would be affected negatively and less protected.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the same representation in all states. This alliance was led by Patrick Henry. They argued for the Bill of Rights and was against every move to establish a new Constitution, on the ground that, the constitution will give more powers to the National government and this will be detrimental to the citizens' rights.
A compromise was agreed on and after much debate on the issues of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was submitted to the Congress of Federation in 1787 and by 1788, it had been ratified by most states.
A Hereditary Monarchy is a form of government that is passed down through family lineage.
Historically this is the most common type of monarchy and continues to exist in the modern day.
<u>Scientists</u><u>' argument over the relative importance of heredity and environmental influences is called the</u><u> nature-nurture debate.</u>
What does nurture refer to in the nature vs nurture debate?
- Reviewed by Psychology Today Staff. The expression “nature vs. nurture” describes the question of how much a person's characteristics are formed by either “nature” or “nurture.”
- “Nature” means innate biological factors (namely genetics), while “nurture” can refer to upbringing or life experience more generally.
What does nurture refer to?
Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture.
Who said nature vs. nurture?
The phrase 'nature versus nurture' was first coined in the mid-1800s by the English Victorian polymath Francis Galton in discussion about the influence of heredity and environment on social advancement.
Learn more about nurture
brainly.com/question/11333427
#SPJ4
