All categories

3 years ago

Can someone help me find X of this triangle? thanks :)

Mathematics

2 answers:

tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago

7 0

Since it is an equilateral triangle, all of the sides are the same length.

So, x=14 :)

Hope this helps!

FinnZ [79.3K]3 years ago

6 0

All of the sides are in same length... So, the answer is x=14.

You might be interested in

For f(x) = 3x+1 and g(x) = x^2-6, find (g/f)(x)

nexus9112 [7]

G/f(x) = x^2 - 6 / 3x + 1
3x + 1 = x^2 - 6
x^2 - 3x - 6 - 1 = 0
x^2 - 3x - 7 = 0
x = 4.54 , x = - 1.54

i am a mathematics teacher. if anything to ask please pm me

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A investor obtained a loan of $600,000 to buy a car wash business. The monthly mortgage payment was based on 30 years at 5.5%. F

Lisa [10]

Answer:

The monthly mortgage payment is $ 8306.58

Step-by-step explanation:

Given as :

The loan taken as $ 600,000

The rate of interest = 5.5 %

The time period = 30 Years

So, from compounded method

Amount = principal × $(1 +\frac{Rate}{100})^{Time}$

or, Amount = $ 600,000 × $(1 +\frac{5.5}{100})^{30}$

Or, Amount = $ 600,000 × $(1.055)^{30}$

∴ Amount = $ 2990370.77

<u>Now for The monthly mortgage payment </u>

∵ Time period is 30 years

So , 30 years = 12 × 30 = 360 months

∴ Amount payment in monthly =$ $\frac{2990370.77}{360}$

Or, Amount payment in monthly =$ 8306.58

Hence The monthly mortgage payment is $ 8306.58 Answer

4 0

3 years ago

If Huey measures out his section and has a pair of supplementary angles, and one angle is 112 degrees, what is the other angle?

ArbitrLikvidat [17]

suplimentary angles = 180

so 180-112 = 68

4 0

3 years ago

Explain which event is more likely: rolling two dice and getting a total of 11, or, tossing a coin and getting three Heads in a

amm1812

Answer:

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the erroneous belief that if a particular event occurs more frequently than normal during the past it is less likely to happen in the future (or vice versa), when it has otherwise been established that the probability of such events does not depend on what has happened in the past. Such events, having the quality of historical independence, are referred to as statistically independent. The fallacy is commonly associated with gambling, where it may be believed, for example, that the next dice roll is more than usually likely to be six because there have recently been fewer than the usual number of sixes.

The term "Monte Carlo fallacy" originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913.[1]

8 0

3 years ago

Mitchell is measured in February for the customs of a school play he’s 47 feet fabric he has 12 1/3 yards of fabric how many mor

Step2247 [10]

47- 12 1/3 = 34 2/3
He needs 34 and 2/3 feet more of fabric

8 0

3 years ago