Explanation:
The 1st Nepalese Constituent Assembly was a unicameral body of 601 members that served from May 28, 2008 to May 28, 2012. It was formed as a result of the first Constituent Assembly election held on April 10, 2008.[1] The Constituent Assembly was tasked with writing a new constitution,[2] and acting as the interim legislature for a term of two years. 240 members were elected in single-seat constituencies, 335 were elected through proportional representation,[4] and the remaining 26 seats were reserved for nominated members.[5]
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
4*30
120 pints per day
Tom drinks 120 pints in 30 days
a) The winner-take-all feature is a rule for the Electoral College. It basically says that out of the 48 states that participate, whichever candidate has the majority or popular vote takes all of the state’s Electoral votes.
(b) Presidential candidates will be affected by the electoral college because one of their main focuses is media and money, on states where a lot of people vote based on their own theories. Not leaning towards being Democrat or Republican. Being able to change their thoughts would have a big advantage for them. Another reason effecting presidential candidates is picking Vice Presidents. They will choose a candidate that is on the same party and to bring more appeal to the campaign.
(c) One example, to explain why winner-takes-all can relate to third party candidates, is because it is difficult to win electoral college meaning for third party candidates it’s harder to raise or gain funds.
(d) The Electoral College has been around for so long that to abolish it would require a change in a constitutional amendment. Also it gives confidence and fairness to small states because each elector represents fewer people than in the larger states.
