The court will most likely consider the parties' relative bargaining power.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bargaining power is the collective ability of groups to put control over one another in a circumstance. If all sides are in a dispute on an equivalent basis, then they would have equal bargaining power, such as in a reasonably free market, or between a monopoly and monopsony fairly balanced.
Purchaser bargaining power relates to the leverage customers may impose on businesses to get them to offer higher quality goods, improved customer satisfaction and lower costs. A powerful purchaser will make a market more profitable and diminish the seller's profit potential.
Answer:
Mission.
Explanation:
Considering the stakeholders' perspectives is a significant step or approach to be adopted by business firms when developing a mission statement. It requires that you think about who is affected by your organization and how they might measure your success.
Generally, when the top executives or management are developing a mission statement, decisions, and goals, it is very essential and important that they ensure it is favourable to the stakeholders. Stakeholders can be defined as a group of people who have interest or shares in a business entity and are affected by the decisions of the company.
Hence, the stakeholders perspective needs to be considered at all times because they're part of the business and their actions can affect the success of the business.
Mission typically includes information on the customers served, why the company exists, what the company does, the value received by the customers, and the technology used.
Answer: Participation strategy
Explanation: Participation strategy refers to the strategy in which the management tries to make all the individuals in a group to collectively work for the accomplishment of a goal. It refers to associate the workers in an objective to give them a sense of superiority and belongingness towards that goal.
In the given case, Gilbert is trying to make the employees to fell the awareness towards the project by taking their ideas ans suggestions into consideration.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is E.
Answer:
0.76
Explanation:
So, in this particular question we are given that that there are two assets which are the; [1]. stock fund and [2]. a long-term government and corporate bond fund.
From the question/problem, we have that the Expected ret and the std. dev. for the Stock fund is 18% and 25% respectively. Also, the Expected ret and std. dev. for Bond fund 11% and 18% respectively.
Thus, the investment proportion in the minimum variance portfolio of the bond fund = 1 - [ ( 18%)² - 0.4 × 25% × 18%) ÷ ( 25%)² + (18%)² - 2 × 0.4 × 25% × 18%. = 1 - [0.0144 ÷ 0.0609 ] = 1 - 0.24 = 0.76.
Answer:
Projects E,F and G should NOT be considered.
Optimal Capital is $5,750,000
Explanation:
The accept-or-reject rule, using the IRR method, is to acceptthe project if its Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is higher than theWeighted Average Cost of Capital(k) [r>k]. The project shall berejected if its internal rate of return is e lower than theWeighted Average Cost of Capital cost of (r<k)
Accept if r>k
Reject if r<k
Mayaccept if r = k
If the Weighted Average Cost of Capitl (WACC) is less than IRRrate, then the project has positive NPV; if it is equal to IRR, theproject has a Zero NPV, and if it is greater than the IRR, theproject has negative NPV.
The projects should be accepted as the rate of return on theproject is higher than the WACC(10.8%) which means that theprojects will be profitable as the returns are higher than the costof the project (capital). Considering this projects E,F and G should NOT be considered.
And considering the sizes the Optimal Capital is $5,750,000 (the addition of sizes of all projects)
