1.perfect competition
2.monopolistic competition
3.oligopoly
4.monopoly
Answer:
Explanation:
X - number of units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600X
Total cost for purchasing = 2000X
a. For 4000 units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600 * 4000 = $7,900,000
Total cost for purchasing = 2000* 4000 = $8,000,000
In this case producing is cheaper. Therefore, it is better to produce
b. Y - break-even point
Then : 1,500,000 + 1600 * Y = 2000* Y
So 1,500,000 = 400 Y
Y = 3750
At №of units less than 3750 purchasing will be the better option
And above 3750 producing will be the better option
Answer: The options are given below:
A. $18.00
B. $1,036.80
C. $2.00
D. $7.20
E. $64.00
The correct option is D. $7.20
Explanation:
From the question above, we were given:
Annual demand = 100,000 units
Production = 4 hour cycle
d = 400 per day (250 days per year)
p = 4000 units per day
H = $40 per unit per year
Q = 200
We will be using the EPQ or Q formula to calculate the cost setup, thus:
Q = √(2Ds/H) . √(p/(p-d)
200=√(2x400x250s/40 . √(4000/(4000-400)
200=√5,000s . √1.11
By squaring both sides, we have:
40,000=5,550s
s=40,000/5,550
s=7.20
Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
Answer: a) Option A
Explanation:
There will be no effect on retained earnings because retained earnings do not increase as a result of shares being sold. It increases when net income increases.
Total paid-in capital increases when stock is sold for higher than its par value or when treasury stock is sold for higher than its acquisition price. The treasury stock here was sold for higher than it was bought so this would increase the total paid in capital.
