A. correct me if im wrong
Answer:
Moral codes and social sanctions
Explanation:
Externality is when the actions of a producer or consumer have an effect on third parties not involved in production or consumption.
Externality can be positive or negative.
Postive externality is when the benefits of economic activities to third parties exceeds the costs.
Negative externality is when the costs of economic activities to third parties exceeds the benefits.
Smoking and littering the environment with cigeratte butts is an example of an activity that generates negative externality.
Sharon's morals and sense of judgement cautioned her against littering with her cigarette butts because she knows such activity is frowned against by the society. So, in this case she is guided by her moral codes.
This is one of the solutions to externality.
Other solutions include:
Taxation
Integration of different types of businesses through merger or acquisition
Contracts
Charities
I hope my answer helps you
$900,000
Depreciation for the year $600,000
Employee bonuses $1,200,000
Total expenses for the year 1,800,000
Expenses to be reported in interim income statement 1,800,000=$900,000
<span>Let amount invested at 9% be "x"; Interest on this is 0.09x dollars
Amt. invested at 10% is "15000-x" ; Interest on this is 0.1(15000-x)=1500-0.1x
dollars
EQUATION:
interext + interest=1432 dollars
0.09x + 1500-0.10x = 1432
-0.01x = -68
x=$6800 (amt invested at 9%)
15000-6800=$8200 (amt invested at 10%)</span>
Answer:
The answer is: C) Special interests; they are bearing the costs.
Explanation:
A group of people, institutions or companies that share a common goal are more likely to achieve them or be more successful at their execution when they are easily and publicly identified to them. In politics, this is the whole concept behind lobbying. Generally those groups that take the effort to make their demands public will be more successful in achieving them. That is true even if some other group or the majority of the population suffers from those actions.
We can use the NRA as an example for this assumption. They are a well organized, funded and publicized group that firmly believes in their right to bear arms. I myself share that same belief. But I doubt anyone could argue why we need to sell machine guns or grenade launchers to common ordinary people that aren´t even trained to use them. But they have made their claim so well known and connected with the right politicians, that even mass murdering machines are available to the common public. And the cost of their actions are been paid mostly by innocent victims (and their families and communities) and the nation as a whole.
