Answer:
The answer is d. Equity theory.
Explanation:
As the name implies, this theory is based on the idea that workers are motivated by fairness, and will adjust their performance according to what they consider as fair.
This strategy, when done well, ensures that workers feel in a comfortable environment; on the other hand if, for instance, a worker notices a peer that makes more money for the same job, he might decrease his/her performance and do less work.
Answer:Yes
Explanation:
Yes, a trade of properties is possible if this trade does not involve financing and the properties are not mortgaged.
This is the primary conditions to be met during the exchange. Properties can be swapped because both own the small home so the chances that one home is expensive than the other is very low.
Further, swapping home can meet the requirement of both parties.
Explanation:
A bystander effect is a social psychological assert which claims that people are less likely offer to help other person if there are people around at the same spot. It is a psychological theory which says that the people refuses to help other victims in the presence of of other people.
The more the number of people or bystanders, the less likely a victim is going to be helped by other people.
Thus according to bystander effect ---
(i) Situations where people will offer help are :
Options (a), (c) and (d).
(ii). Situations where people are less likely to offer help are:
Option (b).
And when a man crying to help his cat who is trapped inside a burning house.
Answer:
Chandragupta Maurya used force to be sure no one threatened his power.
Answer:
<h3>Yes, society as Kurt Vonnegut imagines in his "Harrison Bergeron" could be read as symbolic of realities in our society today.</h3>
Explanation:
Vonnegut's story presents a future where the U.S Constitution has created a complete uniform society where every citizen is treated equally in every aspects of life. However, to achieve this feat, the government has abolished the principles of individuality and personal liberty.The government subdues any form of individual talent or intellectual abilities.
Vonnegut does not seem to distinguish any particular government here, but we can relate a similar case given the time when he has written this story. The story was published in 1961 which was during the time of Cold War. Perhaps through this story, he wanted to criticize the socialist or Marxian form of government emphasized by USSR.
The story revolves a government that tries to subdue any form of individualistic ideas or innovations. It contrast the tenets of capitalism and democracy where individual freedom and talented intellectuals are oppressed by the government.
Similarly, the control of media and oppression of freedom of speech and expression by governments are some symbolic realities in our society today. This is because the government tries to suppress any form of dissent or criticism against them. Individuals who opposes the government are usually forced into silence by imprisonment and other forms of threats.
