Answer:
A
Explanation:
He would applaud the author for arguing in favor of a passive approach to racial equality.
We do not want the men of another color for our brothers-in-law, but we do want them for our brothers.
According to the statement above we can explain that they really want a mixed color family, although those men are brother-in-law, they are parts of the family, really brothers in heart same way.
Visceral Pain is the pain that the nurse understands this client is experiencing.
<h3>What is pain?</h3>
Pain is an unpleasant sensation that alerts you to potential problems. It may be characterized as constant, hammering, piercing, agonizing, constricting, or in a variety of various ways.
Vital organs in the body's natural centerline are the focus of visceral pain. As in this case, the patient is feeling pain in the kidney and the nurse is able to understand that pain as she has studied it and knows the visceral pain that is present in the internal part of the body.
Learn more about pain, here:
brainly.com/question/3647258
#SPJ4
D I think or maybe A, I know it’s between them two
Answer:
a market-based economic system based on free enterprise with some government involvement
Explanation:
The mixed-market economy is an economy type in which both the government involvement is present, and the private businesses are thriving. This type of economies are usually successors of a command economy, but the system has changed gradually, and the economy has transformed to a certain degree. The government still is an important player int he economy, and it usually owns and controls the largest and most valuable natural resources of the country. On the other hand, the private businesses have been enabled to developed and good conditions for them have been provided, thus the private businesses are thriving. The private businesses and the government are in good business relation, thus they are economic partners. A prime example of this type of economy is China.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory in philosophy, also known as the ethics that define <em>the morality of actions</em>, it was developed by an English philosopher named Jeremy Bentham, and promoted by many other philosophers like John Stuart Mill.
The theory states that the best action is the one making the most overall happiness, or "<em>utility</em>", in reference to usefulness.
Among other statements framing those principals we have,
"<em>The greatest good for the greatest number</em>"
This "greatest happiness principle" states that moral actions are those that maximize utility, or happiness, for the greatest number of people.
Therefore, actions resulting in the greatest pleasure for the utility of society are the best actions.
And here we have the basic principles of utilitarianism:
- Pleasure or Happiness are the only things with Intrinsic value.
- Actions are right if they promote Happiness, and wrong if they produce unhappiness.
- Everyone's Happiness counts equally.
Thereby, the ethical principle that states that remark is:
<h3>"
the collective utilitarian principle"
(b)</h3>