Answer:
The growth rate of the U.S economy in 2011 was 5.65%
Explanation:
This is a simple calculation
We use this formula to calculate percent changes from one period to another:
% change = 
We have that the GDP for 2010 was $11,150 billion and the GDP in 2011 was $11,780 billions we then apply the formula:
% change = 
% change = 
This means that the growth rate of the U.S economy in 2011 was 5.65%
Answer:
the marginal revenue product of baseball players is greater than the marginal revenue product of college professors.
Explanation:
Baseball players are responsible for a baseball teams' revenues, and they add up billions of dollars per year. For example, Max Scherzer sells jerseys, caps and other merchandise for millions of dollars, and his team winning the World Series this year increases the team's revenue greatly. Sometimes even without winning a championship some players still generate lots of revenue.
An individual's salary should be proportional to the revenue that they generate. Colleges have huge amounts of revenue, and college professors are responsible for a large portion of it.
The problem hear is that there are a lot of college professors and assistants, and the revenue must be split between many people. For example, Harvard University's revenue is about $5.5 billion per year, but it has over 16,000 employees (including about 2,400 professors).
The contribution margin approach helps managers in short-tern decision making because it reports costs and revenues at their current value.
The contribution margin ratio/approach allows companies to determine their profits they can make from a product minus variable costs.
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Each of the buyer and seller are small when we are relating it with the whole market. so, there will be no power in the hands of a single decision maker and if a firm wants to change their prices then it will not have any influence on the market price. In a competitive market, there are large number of buyers and sellers, thus, one buyer or seller doesn't have any impact on the market price.
