Answer: 12.86 years.
Explanation: Rule of 72 says that to know in how many years the amount can double can be done by using the interest rate. The rule of 72 says that 72 divided by the annual interest rate will give the number of years it will take to double the amount.
Rule of 72:
Rate of interest = 5.60%/4
Number of years to double the investment = 72 ÷ 1.4
Number of years to double the investment = 51.43/4 = 12.86 years
Therefore, it will take 12.86 years for the $1850 to get double to $3700.
Answer:
37,000 units
Explanation:
The computation of the total equivalent units for direct material is shown below:
= Transferred to finished goods during the month of July + Ending work in process during the month of July - Inventory in process as on July 1
= 37,500 units + 3,500 units - 4,000 units
= 41,000 units - 4,000 units
= 37,000 units
We simply used the above formula so that the total equivalent units for direct materials using the FIFO method could come
Answer:
The total manufacturing cost per unit is $10.50
Explanation:
Material cost per unit = Total material cost / Equivalent units of Material cost
Material cost per unit = $60,000 / 10,000 = $6 per unit
Conversion cost per unit = Total Conversion cost / Equivalent units of conversion cost
Conversion cost per unit = $90,000 / 20,000 = $4.5 per unit
Total Manufacturing cost = $6 + $4.50 = $10.50 per unit
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.
Explanation:
When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.
I think is A because accomplishment is not a emotional thing.
