Through isotopic analysis, forensic scientists can identify mutilated or deteriorated body, they can also identify his geographic location and life history. <span />
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
1. Gather 11 cups and then fill each cup with 5 ounces of whole milk, next is take the first cup to add a known quantity of lactaid. As a control, take another cup and do not add any lactaid. After 1minute, pour a known quantity of Benedicts into cups of milk. Record the color (blue is the least amount of glucose progressing to green, then yellow, orange, red, and brick red/brown). Take another cup of milk and then add the lactaid and wait 5minutes next is add the Benedicks. Record the color, repeat steps 7-10 adding 5minutes each time until there are no cups left (15 minutes, 20, 25,30,35,40,45).
For the last is Graph the data and form conclusions.
Unless you bring them into your soul. Or your soul puts them in front of you.
