Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Third, the people wanted their sins to be forgiven, to go to heaven or to take back goods from the Holy Lands or because they had committed a crime and were forced by the church to go on a Crusade. And some people just went on Crusades for fun. Taking back Jerusalem was the main reason why Crusades occurred.
Answer:
papermaking, printing, the compass, and gunpowder
Hope this helps
Answer:
Musa, flooded Cairo with his generosity. He left no court emir nor holder of a royal office without the gift of a load of gold. The people of Cairo made incalculable profits out of him and his travelling party in buying and selling and giving and taking. They exchanged gold until they depressed its value in Egypt and caused its price to fall.
Answer:
B. To divide and negotiate with the communist world.
Explanation:
Nixon went to china to try and drive a wedge between them and the soviets. and then maybe use china to try and contain Vietnam. “Instead of using Vietnam to contain China, Nixon concluded that he had better use China to contain Vietnam.”
hope that helped
<3
