Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For the points lol
Answer:
Contradiction
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that G has more than one cycle and let C be one of the cycles of G, if we remove one of the edges of C from G, then by our supposition the new graph G' would have a cycle. However, the number of edges of G' is equal to m-1=n-1 and G' has the same vertices of G, which means that n is the number of vertices of G. Therefore, the number of edges of G' is equal to the number of vertices of G' minus 1, which tells us that G' is a tree (it has no cycles), and so we get a contradiction.
A=3,500×(1+0.011÷12)^(12×4)
A=3,657.36
Interest earned
=3657.36-3500=157.36
Answer:
Yes, without using the distributive property, we get the value for the given expression 2(x - 3) ≤ 10 as x ≤ 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, the given expression is:
2(x - 3) ≤ 10
Yes, the given expression can be solved without using the DISTRIBUTIVE Property
Here, consider the given expression:
2(x - 3) ≤ 10
Now, divide the inequality by 2 on both sides, we get:

Now adding (+3) on both the sides, we get:
(x - 3) ≤ 5 ⇒ (x - 3 + 3 ) ≤ 5 + 3
or, x ≤ 8
Hence, without using the distributive property, we get the value of x ≤ 8 for the given expression 2(x - 3) ≤ 10
#1 is b and #2 is also b ,, i think..so sorry if i’m wrong!