Answer:
I would write "terrestrial/lives on land during all life stages" between the frog and pigeon branches.
Explanation:
Jaw evolution has started with fish, so i'd place that before the perch, evolution of four limbs is next and I would plate it between the perch and the frog. Evolution of an egg has ensured that organisms remain terrestrial during all stages of life and don't need to rely on water to lay their eggs. So I would place that between the frog and the pigeon. True mammary glands and true hair, as we know it formed on mammals so i'd place that between the pigeon and the rats (although synapsids evolved similar structures long before birds even existed). And lastly, I would place "walking on two legs" between rats and human branches. Because our ancestors evolved bipedalism relatively late.
Answer:
Subpapillary plexus nourishes the dermal papillae and epidermis.
Explanation:
The superficial subpapillary plexus could also be regarded to as superficial plexus
. It is composed of postcapillary venules found at the junction of the papillary and reticular dermis and the lower plexus at the dermal subcutaneous interface. It lies below the dermal papillae, and supplies the capillaries in the dermal papillae. The pink color of skin is mainly due to the blood seen in venules of this plexus.
I am not sure but I think that endoplasmic reticulum is the right answer. Hope this will help.
Explanation:
Is The Hill (thehill.com) a trusted news website or does it have a strong bias?
From what I’ve seen, The Hill’s news reporting is pretty even handed and accurate, although the site is considered to be slightly right leaning.
However, they also employ John Solomon as their executive VP of digital video and as a columnist. With a strong background in investigative journalism, his work of late has descended into promoting baseless conspiracy theories, like the widely discredited Uranium One. I’ve seen stories of his promoted by the right-wing media in the past couple of years that have fallen apart under scrutiny.
UPDATE (5–23–2020): Someone a couple of revisions that I rejected. Nothing about spelling or grammar. This answer was accurate when it was written, although The Hill has since parted with Solomon. Brendan Delaney’s second edit suggestion was not only inaccurate, but would have made the answer his own. Better that he simply answer the question himself or make his points in a comment. But then again if you do think about it Well…John Solomon was their chief editor for a long time and he’s a hard-right, loony conspiracy theorist nutbar. The site is also owned by Jerry Finkelstein, who is good friends with Trump. Furthermore, The Hill does gives face time to a lot of hard-right opinion pieces.
On the flipside, they ARE a good aggregator of political news and publish stories you won’t find elsewhere, which balances things out somewhat.
Solomon left a few months ago Fox News and The Hill seems to be making an honest effort to balance their editorial more. Jury is still out on whether they’ll be successful or not.
B. Halons............................
