<u>This is false.</u>
Individuals know stealing isn't right, yet they do it as a result of psychological mechanisms, for example, motivated blindness.
"Motivated blindness" alludes to the human propensity to neglect data that neutralizes what individuals need to accept, either in light of the fact that the conviction is to their greatest advantage or just on the grounds that they have held the conviction quite a while and they are candidly put resources into holding it. The human personality is modified to specifically observe prove supporting the ends it might want to reach, while it has a tendency to overlook or rebate confirm that conflicts with its previous inclinations.
If there were no predators they would overpopulate (like us humans have). It would also mean the things that were once predators would die off, leaving only the producers and primary consumers to run the world (so pretty much the vegans/vegetarians and anything that doesn't eat meat, as well as plants).
Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
Answer:
by not giving me your number
Explanation:
Major shifts, that is shifts in the paradigms, are not very frequent - they would make scientific research unstable, as any result of a smaller study could be made invalid by a paradigm shift,
minor changes however are quite common - basically every scientific study adds to the common knowledge and this also can be considered a minor change.
Therefore the best answer is
<span>Major
shifts in scientific views very rarely occur, but minor modifications
of prior knowledge are continually made based on new research.</span>
