Answer:
The Total amount is shown in the income statement $34,240
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be presented in the 2020 income statement is shown below:
Dividend collected by Howdy Doody corporation (18% of $68,000) $12,240
rise in Fair value of Stock credited to the income statement ($74,000 - $52,000) $22,000
The Total amount is shown in the income statement $34,240
Answer:
The correct option is B. 9200.
Explanation:
This can simply be answered as follows:
.................. (1)
Where:
= Weighted moving average forecast (0.4, 0.3, 0.3) for Week 6 = ?
= Week 5 demand = 11,000
= Week 4 demand = 9,000
= Week 3 demand = 7,000
The (0.4, 0.3, 0.3) implies that:
= Weight of Week 5 demand = 0.4
= Weight of Week 4 demand = 0.3
= Weight of Week 3 demand = 0.3
Substituting all the relevant values into equation (1), we have:
= (11,000 * 0.40) + (9,000 * 0.30) + (7,000 * 0.30) = 9,200
Therefore, the correct option is B. 9200.
The answer is material math error.
An adjusting entry is essentially a bookkeeping modification that improves the accuracy of the financial statements by reflecting the revenue and spending on an accrual basis, which is typically but not always the case. At the conclusion of the accounting period, adjustments are made. This might happen towards the end of the month or at the end of the year.
Prior period adjustments are errors or mistakes committed in the prior reporting period. These mistakes must be remedied or eliminated by taking suitable corrective action. Prior period items include factual errors, arithmetic errors, and errors in applying accounting rules.
Therefore, material math error is the correct option.
To know more about adjustment to financial statements click here:
brainly.com/question/24178504
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.
