Answer: (x + [-1], y + [1])
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>See attached. </em>We can draw, or picture it in our heads, what the reflection would look like. Then we can pick one (or multiple to test) points and see the translation.
We can also test with a set of points. B', (2, 4) becomes G in the transformation. G is at (1, 5)
(1 - 2, 5 - 4) -> (-1, 1)
Answer:
I will do it but what is the GCF of part B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The larger wheel is 10979.04098 more than the smaller wheel.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that,
The circumference of the great wheel was twelve thousand and forty-one thousandth inches.
C = 12000.041 inches
The circumference of the lesser wheel was only one thousand twenty-one and two hundred-thousand inches.
C' = 1021.00002 inches
We need to find how much larger was the great wheel. To find it, take the difference of C and C'.
C-C' = 12000.041 inches - 1021.00002 inches
= 10979.04098 inches
Hence, the larger wheel is 10979.04098 more than the smaller wheel.
Answer:
- zeros: x = -3, -1, +2.
- end behavior: as x approaches -∞, f(x) approaches -∞.
Step-by-step explanation:
I like to use a graphing calculator for finding the zeros of higher order polynomials. The attachment shows them to be at x = -3, -1, +2.
__
The zeros can also be found by trial and error, trying the choices offered by the rational root theorem: ±1, ±2, ±3, ±6. It is easiest to try ±1. Doing so shows that -1 is a root, and the residual quadratic is ...
x² +x -6
which factors as (x -2)(x +3), so telling you the remaining roots are -3 and +2.
___
For any odd-degree polynomial with a positive leading coefficient, the sign of the function will match the sign of x when the magnitude of x gets large. Thus as x approaches negative infinity, so does f(x).