90 % because you move the decimal 2 times to the right.
Answer: 26
Step-by-step explanation: assignment on edg
Answer:
a) 0.623 (62.3%)
b) 0.764 (76.4%)
c) 0.6 (60%)
Step-by-step explanation:
a) defining the event F= the product is favorable , then the probability is
P(F) = probability that the study was sponsored by food industry * probability that the product is favorable given that it was sponsored + probability that the study had no corporate ties * probability that the product is favorable given that it was not sponsored = 0.70 * 0.68 + 0.30 * 0.49 = 0.623
b) for conditional probability we use the theorem of Bayes , then defining the event S= the study was sponsored by the food industry , we have:
P(S/F)=P(S∩F)/P(F)= 0.70 * 0.68/0.623 = 0.764 (76.4%)
where
P(S∩F)=probability that the study was sponsored by food industry and the product was found favorable
P(S/F)=probability that the study was sponsored by food industry given that the product was found favorable
c) for U= the product was found unfavourable , doing the same procedure as in a)
P(U)= 0.70 * 0.10 + 0.30 * 0.35 = 0.175
and the corresponding conditional probability is
P(N/U)=P(N∩U)/P(U)= 0.30 * 0.35 / 0.175 = 0.6 (60%)
where N represents the event = the study had no industry funding
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: <em>Calculate per apartment;</em>
<em>⟼</em> 228,000 ÷ 24
⟼ 9,500
Step 2: <em>Multiply the price per apartment by 10;</em>
⟼ 9,500 × 10
⟼ 95,000
Step 3: <em>Substract the amount of 10 apartments from 24 apartments.</em>
<em>⟼</em><em> </em>228,000 - 95,000
⟼ 133,000
<u>Therefore, </u>$133,000 is still available for the remaining apartments.
-4 < 8. Negatives are lower than positives so the inequality should be negative is less than 8