The best answer for this question would be:
$150,000
Because in the method of the “non-working” spouse method, they are given a calculation of (18 - youngest child's age) × $10,000 (18 being the legal age)
Resulting that the solution would be:
<span> (18 - 3) × $10,000 = $150,000</span>
Answer: Franchise
Explanation: In simple words, a franchise refers to an arrangement under which one entity allows other entity to use its business models, procedures and intellectual properties etc, in return of any loyalty or other such benefit.
This is a common arrangement nowadays and is usually used by the organisations to operate their business globally.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is franchise.
Answer:
No, the second car shouldn't be purchased.
Explanation:
After buying the first car, when second car is to be brought the marginal benefit is lower than marginal cost. So, only one car should be brought.
Answer:
10.23%
Explanation:
Formula for computation of equivalent taxable yield is r = rm/1-t. Where the tax rate is t, rm is Yield on municipal bond and r is Tax equivalent yield
r = rm/1-t
r = 6.75% / 1 - 34%
r = 6.75% / 0.66%
r = 10.22727272727273%
r = 10.23%
So, the equivalent taxable yield to a taxpayer in a combined federal plus state 34% tax bracket is 10.23%.
Answer:
The sentence is unethical if there is a clear responsability on the mistakes. If the mistakes were made, and no one can be truly held accountable for that, then, the sentence is not unethical.
Explanation:
For example, if the government is corrupt, and officials actively commit embezzlement, the phrase "mistakes were made" is unethical because it is diverting the personal responsability of the corrupt officials.
But if for example, there is a volcano eruption, and the goverment tries its best to avoid casualties, but because of some involuntary mistakes some people still die, the phrase is not unethical because the mistakes were not voluntary and the consequences of those were not intended.
