Answer:
$46,141.71
Step-by-step explanation:
This looks about right, based on weekly deposits for the duration. However, I cannot vouch for it entirely, as the number of weekly deposits in 15 years will actually be 782.
_____
Computing this by hand doing the initial balance separately from the weekly deposits, I get a total of $46,252.10 using 782 weekly deposits. For that purpose, I tried to figure an equivalent weekly interest rate given monthly compounding and the fact there are 52 5/28 weeks in a year on average.
I suspect the only way to get this to the cent would be to build a spreadsheet with payment dates and interest computation/payment dates. Some months, there would be 5 deposits between interest computations; some years there would be 53 deposits.
Answer:
Option 4. x = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection of a point across the y-axis is equal to
(x,y) -----> (-x,y)
The rule for reflecting over the Y axis is to negate the value of the x-coordinate of each point, but leave the y-value the same
The coordinates of triangle PQR are
P(1, 4), Q(3, 6), and R(5, 2)
Applying the rule of the reflection across the y-axis we have
P(1, 4) -----> P'(-1, 4)
Q(3, 6) ----> Q'(-3, 6)
R(5, 2)----> R'(-5, 2)
The reflection line is the y-axis
Remember that the equation of the y-axis is x=0
therefore
The equation of the reflection line is x=0
Answer:.
Step-by-step explanation:.
No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the operation of the negative and positive numbers
- (-) + (-) = (-)
- (-) × (-) = (+)
- (-) + (+) = the sign of greatest [(-) if the greatest is (-) or (+) if the greatest is (+)]
- (-) × (+) = (-)
- (-) - (+) = (-)
- (+) - (-) = (+)
∵ The expression is -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n
- Simplify it
∵ 2(3 + 2n) = 2(3) + 2(2n) = 6 + 4n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n = -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n
- Multiply the bracket by (-)
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -8 - 6 - 4n + 7n
- Add the like terms
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = (-8 - 6) - 4n + 7n
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -14 + 3n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is equivalent to -14 + 3n
∵ -14 + 3n ≠ -30 - 13n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Learn more:
You can learn more about the directed numbers in brainly.com/question/10364988
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
5×3+5×w
Step-by-step explanation:
