Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(1) 2x - 6y = -12
(2) x + 2y = 14
There is a -6y and a +2y. Since they have opposite signs, I'll try to eliminate the y terms. (That's my choice. There is more than one way to solve these.)
Multiply eq. (2) by 3:
3x + 6y = 42
Then add the result to eq. (1) to eliminate the y terms:
2x - 6y = -12
3x + 6y = 42
------------------
5x = 30, so x = 6
Now plug the value of x into eq. (2) and solve for y:
6 + 2y = 14
2y = 8
y = 4
Why did I use eq. (2) to solve for y? Because it's less work. I could have used eq. (1) instead:
2(6) - 6y = -12
12 - 6y = -12
-6y = -24
y = 4
More than one way to solve.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
y - 4 = -5(x + 1)
y - 4 = -5x - 5
y = -5x - 1
Answer:
1013
Step-by-step explanation:
993 + 10 + 10.
Answer:
Let 'x' and 'y' be two different numbers.
Leila says that 75% of a number will always be greater than 50% of a number. The inequality that represents this statement is the following:
0.75x > 0.5y
Let x = 100 and y=200. We have that:
0.75(100) > 0.5(200)
75 > 100 ❌ INCORRECT ❌
Given that we found a case in which 75% of a number is not greater than 50% of a number, we can conclude that Leila's claim is incorrect.
