The length of the room is 96 ft.
Let L be the length of the room and W be the width of the room.
Since the length is twice its width, L = 2W.
Its area A = LW
= 2W × W
= 2W²
If each side were increased by 1 foot, then its new area is A' = (L + 1)(W + 1)
= (2W + 1)(W + 1)
= 2W² + 3W + 1
Since the room would contain 145 ft more if each side were increased by 1 foot, then its new area is A' = A + 145 = 2W² + 3W + 1
2W² + 145 = 2W² + 3W + 1
145 = 3W + 1
3W = 145 - 1
3W = 144
W = 144/3
W = 48 ft.
Since its length L = 2W, substituting W = 48 into the equation, we have
L = 2(48)
L = 96 ft
So, the length of the room is 96 ft.
Learn more about length of a room here:
brainly.com/question/24375989
Answer:
subway
Explanation:
︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎
Any kind of frequency, including the angular kind, is closely involved with
time. Still, for some unknown reason,you've given us no time information
whatsoever ... a peculiar decision on your part, since we can be sure that
it's right there, inexorably intertwined with the part of the question that you
DID copy and share with us.
Furthermore and moreover, for one with no prior experience with simple
harmonic motion, the many symbols in this question such as ' d ', ' a ',
' << ', ' d₂ ', and ' a₂ ' would be of no help at all to guide him toward a
solution. On the contrary, he would conclude that the question itself
had been posted by some alien life form.
To sum up: Come back and post the drawing that goes along with the
question, make sure you have presented all of the information that the
question includes, and then we'll talk.
A heat engine <em>is </em>a device that uses to produce useful work.
Definition - a device for producing motive power from heat, such as a gasoline engine or steam engine.
So..
If this is a true or false question.. Your answer is:
TRUE
Hope this helps!
- Kylie
Last month, we featured IRB best practices (“IRBs: Navigating the Maze” November 2007 Observer), and got the ball rolling with strategies and tips that psychological scientists have found to work. Here, we continue the dissemination effort with the second of three articles by researchers who share their experiences with getting their research through IRB hoops. Jerry Burger from Santa Clara University managed to do the seemingly impossible — he conducted a partial replication of the infamous Milgram experiment. Read on for valuable advice, and look for similar coverage in upcoming Observers. These are the first words I said to Muriel Pearson, producer for ABC News’ Primetime, when she approached me with the idea of replicating Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience studies. Milgram’s work was conducted in the early 1960s before the current system of professional guidelines and IRBs was in place. It is often held up as the prototypic example of why we need policies to protect the welfare of research participants. Milgram’s participants were placed in an emotionally excruciating situation in which an experimenter instructed them to continue administering electric shocks to another individual despite hearing that person’s agonizing screams of protest. The studies ignited a debate about the ethical treatment of participants. And the research became, as I often told my students, the study that can never be replicated. Hope this helps!
